 | RestonWeb Community Chatboard |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
RestonResident Longtime Member
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 Posts: 1131
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| health reform gets bluecross more customers. of course they want it. it is more money. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chester Longtime Member
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 1975
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Obama is trying to get public support by bashing the insurance companies and the media is swallowing it. Maybe regurgitating it would be a better explanation. It's too bad that we no longer seem to have an independent media capable of keeping Washington in check. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CaptHacker
Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Posts: 377
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Health insurance companies deserve to be bashed. There's nothing good about a company that expects you to pay them expensive monthly premiums, and then, if something goes wrong, they hunt through your records to try and find an excuse to not cover you. They have no problem taking your cash, but they have little or no intention of paying for benefits. I call that theft.
I know of people that won't even see a doctor if they think there's something wrong with them because they're sure they'll be canceled. This is a rampant problem in this country. I didn't do it. Other "beneficiaries" of health care didn't do it. Who's doing it? The health insurance companies, and only because as things are now, they can get away with it.
Put down the crack pipe Chester...just put it down. _________________ George W. Bush....he didn't raise your taxes, he lowered your income!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bob Bruhns Longtime Member

Joined: 15 Oct 2003 Posts: 9381 Location: Herndon, Virginia, USA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I had an operation in 2008, and it was covered quite well by my health care provider (Kaiser Permanente). I am fortunate I guess to have health care through my job.
There are horror stories in health care, though, and sometimes if you are not looking at everyday mainstream procedures, you get funny looks, quick and inaccurate answers, etc. And the issue of pre-existing conditions is really tough if you are depending on a job to provide care, and then you are unemployed, and your coverage lapses. On the other hand, there is a reality: who is going to pay for exams, tests, treatments and hospital rooms? Where does the money come from?
Maybe the whole cost and the whole incoming payment need to be considered. That's a big job. I have not done this, maybe somebody should. Maybe somebody has. _________________ The national debt and the deficit are robbing your children, your grandchildren, and your great-grandchildren. http://www.usdebtclock.org/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chester Longtime Member
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 1975
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
California has passed a law limiting waiting periods to see doctors because of the long waits to see doctors at Kaiser Permanente for non-urgent visits. The long waits were causing patients to forgo visits or to go outside the network and pay the higher co-pay. Other states are following suit.
The whole issue of HMO's and their ownership of medical facilities seems to be a conflict of interest at least and possibily an anti-trust violation. I think financial payors and service providers should be kept separate. The whole practice of providing year-end bonuses to physicians to reduce costs creates a perverse incentive to deny service.
Last edited by Chester on Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:26 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stix Longtime Member
Joined: 17 Oct 2003 Posts: 4575 Location: USofA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CaptHacker wrote: | | Health insurance companies deserve to be bashed. |
One has got to love all the generalizations. Obama and 'Obama surrogate' insurance industry bashing is 90% anti-free market rant in my view. It is a form of dishonesty.. fit for politicians but not for thinking people.
I invite those that may disagree with this to answer the following,
Of Americans covered by private insurance, how many claims are denied or are dropped to avoid a claim payment? Percent/year of the total of upward of 200 million insured would be an acceptable answer.
Of Americans covered by the government Medicare/Medicaid programs, what is the equivalent numbers of claims denied? Percent/year of the upward total of 70 million insured would be an acceptable answer.
How will Obamacare fix either of these problems without increasing cost or lowering care quality?
And while at it,
What is the profit margin of the healthcare insurance sector? I wait for qualtative justification that "insurance companies" in general "deserve" to be bashed...
. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chester Longtime Member
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 1975
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CaptHacker wrote: | Health insurance companies deserve to be bashed. There's nothing good about a company that expects you to pay them expensive monthly premiums, and then, if something goes wrong, they hunt through your records to try and find an excuse to not cover you. They have no problem taking your cash, but they have little or no intention of paying for benefits. I call that theft.
I know of people that won't even see a doctor if they think there's something wrong with them because they're sure they'll be canceled. This is a rampant problem in this country. I didn't do it. Other "beneficiaries" of health care didn't do it. Who's doing it? The health insurance companies, and only because as things are now, they can get away with it.
Put down the crack pipe Chester...just put it down. |
The point is that the bashing is just a cynical political ploy on the part of the administration to sell the plan to the public that it must be good because it's bad for the insurance companies. Obama's health plan provides the insurers with millions of new healthy customers by mandate or by subsidy. The sick and elderly will be priced out of the market since the insurers will be allowed to charge premiums three times as much as other customers. On top of this, the plans will be labelled as cadillac health plans because of the high premiums and the sick and elderly will be soaked for an excise tax on top of the premium. This health reform plan looks like a disaster, but not for the reasons advanced by the opposition. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stix Longtime Member
Joined: 17 Oct 2003 Posts: 4575 Location: USofA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The "reasons" for much of the opposition to Obamacare is that it raids one troubled entitlement (Medicare) to create another, which in reality will not be paid for without significant healthcare rationing and cost increase for the 250+ or so people with insurance. And please do not cite the CBO scoring based on phony WH/Congressional assumptions.
Federal mandates on insurance companies and patients ala the all-Dem plan are not the way to go .. ameliorating the cost issues at the point of healthcare delivery is. But then that does not satisfy the long range Progressive goal of the only single payer (and benefit arbiter) being the public sector bureaucracy...
. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CaptHacker
Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Posts: 377
|
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 7:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sayeth El Chester:
| Quote: | | The sick and elderly will be priced out of the market since the insurers will be allowed to charge premiums three times as much as other customers. On top of this, the plans will be labelled as cadillac health plans because of the high premiums and the sick and elderly will be soaked for an excise tax on top of the premium. This health reform plan looks like a disaster, but not for the reasons advanced by the opposition. |
....for some reason I find that argument about as close to ludicrous as possible. Ah-oh....looks like Sarah Palin was right all along...Death Panels!!!!
...and yet oddly the President of Consumer Reports (probably another one of them thar socialist/communist left wing fringe groups conspiring to destroy America) is running ads on WTOP telling people to support the health care plan.
Hey, wait a minute...isn't this guy like, well, sort of approaching old age? I guess it must be a suicide wish.
Please don't give me lectures about how "great" our present health care system is. I know of one guy with a "notorious pre-existing condition" who was denied coverage ... well not completely...because he had some sort of back problem and there was something like a 0.5% chance he might need surgery on his back. Now here comes the "well not quite part"...Blue Cross/Blue Shield, for the God fearing rate of only $5000/month would cover him for what they called "Catastrophic insurance" .... that means if someone shoots him in the head, he's covered, if he has an aortic aneurism and an aorta explodes, he's covered. Measles? No. Flu? No. Cancer? No. Anything that in reality doesn't end in his immediate death? No.
What they were doing was flipping him the bird and stating "tough luck, sucker." "Health care is a personal responsibility," as John McCain put it. I guess this guys "personal responsibility" was that he shouldn't have been born in the first place...it's such a burden on the Republican's billionaire elite! _________________ George W. Bush....he didn't raise your taxes, he lowered your income!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chester Longtime Member
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 1975
|
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The Obama regs on pre-existing conditions are very easy for the insurance companies to get around. All they have to discontinue the old plans each year when open enrollment comes around and make the policyholders apply for coverage all over again. If they're accepted, the policy will be priced so high that many will have to forgo insurance. Any plan that costs more than $8000/yr is going to be subject to an excise tax. The whole thing is quite brilliant if you want to throw out the policyholders with high probabily of costly claims. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CaptHacker
Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Posts: 377
|
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That sounds to me like another silly argument. First, the bill isn't finalized so how can you claim there are "loopholes" in it. Second, the intent of the law vs. what's in the law are two different things. There isn't a law on Earth that doesn't have loopholes, but if they're doing they're job right the loopholes will get closed in time...and in this case I suspect they'll get closed quite quickly.
The "Health care is a personal responsibility" argument is just an idiotic way for the Republicans to maintain the status quo.
Let's just take an example of the "Health care is a personal responsibility" argument, but let's use one this theory's staunch supporters, John McCain.
I can just see it now:
| Quote: | Applicant: John McCain
Pre-existing conditions:
1. Arthritic conditions developing in hands, arms and legs due to abusive treatment in North Vietnhamese prisons.
2. Successful treatment for skin cancer.
Dear Mr. McCain:
We here at Weasle's Cross/Weasle's Shield have reviewed your health history and regret to inform you that your application for coverage has been denied due to pre-existing conditions.
We feel that health care is a personal responsibility. As such, the arthritis you have in your bones, which is due to involvement in the Viet Nam War might get costly over time. We also feel this could have been avoided had you not bothered serving your country in the war the U.S. had with North Viet Nam and surrounding countries. It really should have occurred to you that during war you might be permanently injured, and you might one day have consequences from such injuries. Therefore, this problem is not our fault and we can't be expected to cover you for anything related to it, now or in the future.
Secondly, we noted that you've had skin cancer. The number 1 cause of skin cancer is exposure to the sun, and you live in Arizona, one of the sunniest states in the U.S.. Once again, this boils down to your personal responsibility. It has long been known that excessive exposure to the sun causes skin cancer, and yet you chose to live in a state where sun exposure is high, therefore we conclude that the development of skin cancer in your skin is essentially a self created problem, and once again, not of our doing.
For these reasons, we are declining your application for standard health care coverage. We do, however, offer a catastrophic policy, for $5000/month that will take care of medical treatment in the event of your imminent death. Please review the application for this policy and let us know if you find it acceptable. |
...fortunately, John and other senators and congressmen can hide behind the "socialized" care they're awarded for being in the congress or senate and they'll never get exposed to this sort of treatment....no, that's for the rest of us. _________________ George W. Bush....he didn't raise your taxes, he lowered your income!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stix Longtime Member
Joined: 17 Oct 2003 Posts: 4575 Location: USofA
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| CaptHacker wrote: | | The "Health care is a personal responsibility" argument is just an idiotic way for the Republicans to maintain the status quo. |
Assuming that is the Republican argument.. which it isn't.. the Dem argument (as embodied in Obamacare) that our current 'very good' healthcare system needs nearly 120 federal departments to fix it is also "idiotic".
Yes the legislation being twisted into a pretzel to get enough all-Dem votes to pass it, and to allow bureaucrats to "save" us all has "loopholes", which once enacted into law will haunt us for generations. The over $38 trillion unfunded "loophole" in the entitlement called Medicare is a prime example.. you know the very same Medicare that the Dems want to raid to the tune of $500 billion to create some more Medicare-like debt with Obamacare...
. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CaptHacker
Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Posts: 377
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
....and yet that's what John McCain, Sarah Palin, and other "heroes" of the Republican party say....health care is a personal responsibility. McCain openly and firmly stated that in one of his presidential debates.
Well....let's put that to the test, shall we? Allow me to introduce you to Orthopedic surgeon, Dr. Bhaktar. His nickname is "Bahktar the Butcher." Why? Got a pulled muscle in your back? Clearly a spinal fusion is in order ($100,000+). Muscle tension in the neck? Clearly a disk decompression operatiion is needed ($40,000+). Stub your toe? Obviously reconstructive surgery is in order ($5000+)
"Bahktar the Butcher" was a name given to him by the other nurses and doctors that worked with him. Complain about him? "You're Fired." Yes the hospital he worked at was making a killing off his malpractice. And what did the brilliant insurance companies do? Why, the paperwork was in order, so clearly the "benevolent" doctor shouldn't be questioned.
One must be totally brain dead to not see the problems with the health care system. Who's to blame? Both the insurance companies and their inept personnel as well as the medical practice itself.
Who's the victim of this mess? The American people.
The Republican's solution: This is the finest health care system in the world....leave it alone....things are great...unless you have a pre-existing condition, then it's tough cookies.
Ahhh....The billionaire elite and their unquenching need for more and more money...Yeah, that's who we ought to be focusing on, not the American people. It's who can best finance your campaigns or allocate a high paying lobbyist opinion that counts...not the Amercan people. _________________ George W. Bush....he didn't raise your taxes, he lowered your income!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stix Longtime Member
Joined: 17 Oct 2003 Posts: 4575 Location: USofA
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
You must live on another planet CaptHacker, when you are not posting in this forum. Little of what you say about Congressional Republican positions is correct, and most of what you suggest by inference (that Obamacare and amassing huge new entitlement debt is the only way to go) is incorrect.
No Republican has said "...This is the finest health care system in the world....leave it alone....things are great". If you disagree, provide a link.
What they have said is in effect, '...there are problems and here are ways to address them in priority order in these economic times, without massive inefficient federal burcauratic involvement and new debt heaped on us and our children'.
Come back to earth Scotty...
. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CaptHacker
Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Posts: 377
|
Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry stix...it's you and the Republican Elite that are living on another planet.
Let's take a good, hard look at what the Republicans have done recently as well as in the past:
1. Currently - NOTHING. Make lots of noise, call it "socialism", spread fears that the U.S. residents will be subjected to "Death Panels." They're doing the exact same thing they did during the election. I received tons and tons of automated phone messages from the Republicans, and not once did they offer a solution to anything. "Obama pals around with terrorists" is not a solution. "Obama is a socialist" is not a solution. Noise, noise, noise, and nothing but noise..that's the Republicans.
2. Oh, wait....Bush tried to do something for healthcare didn't he? Of course. He tried to pay for tax cuts to the Republican's Billionaire Elite by having tax deductions for health care costs the average American was getting severely reduced....remember that? CEOs of Blue Cross/Blue Shield, United Healthcare, Goldman Sachs, Merryl Lyinch, Bernie Madoff....just a few elements of the Republican's Billionaire Elite would have gotten millions, in some cases tens of millions of dollars, at the expense of probably 99.99% of the American public. Hey...what a great health care plan!!!
3. And when the Republicans were in control of the house....what did they do about health care?? NOTHING, absolutely nothing.
The Republicans have become nothing but a useless, do nothing political party, They have no real solutions to offer anyone. Democrats are far from perfect, but at least they're trying to do something. _________________ George W. Bush....he didn't raise your taxes, he lowered your income!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|